Political consensus holds that Hillary's 4-point squeaker in Indiana yesterday (Tuesday, May 6) was "entirely due" to Republican cross-over votes (credit Limbaugh's "OpChaos"). Drudge Report has MzBill "lending" her campaign some $6-million (of clandestine Saudi contributions) to stagger on, though Obama's extreme-left media partisans unanimously ordain this vile anti-Semite, Black Supremacist, rancid entitlement snob [standard lexicon] of necessity the D-rats' nominee.
Does MzBill expect that the Banana will surface additional Ayers, Rezkos, Wrights --terrorists, crooks, fringe-kook pulpiteers-- so that D-rat superdelegates will topple towards her in exhaustion when Big O's negatives become impossible? Must Obama's "skinist" constituency, no matter how betrayed, nonetheless turn out in force come November to extend their hate-America franchise?
Writing in "American Thinker", one Taru Taylor puts Obama in context of Tuskegee's Booker T. Washington (1880) vs. the demagogic agitator W.E.B. DuBois (1903). Washington's proudly self-reliant, bootstrap Americanism stands in brutal contrast to DuBois' "slave mentality" of perpetual resentment, promoting poverty and ignorance as cheap-junk excuses for socio-cultural malaise. As Taylor puts it, DuBois' black "Talented Tenth" rule over their benighted brethren as "elitist parasites who inhabit a Limbo between White bourgeois heaven and Black proletarian hell." [Taylor is talented, and black.]
Tough stuff, apropos to Jackson, Sharpton, Wright. BTW is not contrary to DuBois, but in stark contradiction-- they share no common ground. A century and a quarter past Tuskegee, we know where the Banana stands. Whose side are you on?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment