Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Refuting IPCC

Link to www.NewsBusters.org/Blogs/Noel-Sheppard/2008/04/Nobel-Prize for letter from a real (vs. PCBS) Nobel Laureate to the UN's International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In brief, one Svend Hendriksen decisively refutes Al Gore's "anthropgenic CO2" schtick over 22,00 years (includes graph).

Seems past time that AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) scamsters met scientific come-uppance in the real world. Like Paul Ehrlich's Population Bomb (1969), Limits to Growth ("peak oil", etc.), The Hot Zone (Great Plagues) and so on, Gore's latest Leftard scare ends cowering before objective natural processes. This blatant fraud and eco-phony has the nerve to accuse detractors of "false conscious" mind-crimes in Gaia's holy name.

Gore is not yet sixty-five. Will his seventieth birthday celebrate Ice Time in the way that Ehrlich has been shown up for the asinine Chicken Little that he is?

5 comments:

Pyrthroes said...

Posting on Hendriksen's refutation of AGW/IPCC, we note that cited link should read:

www.NewsBusters.org/Noel-Sheppard/2008/04/Nobel-Prize

Not sure why one can't access this directly from "Blacksmith".

Pyrthroes said...

Occurs to us that Norman Borlaug, who fostered the Green Revolution that saved 1,000 million lives via genetically modified staple crops, just turned 96 and continues going strong.

Death-cultists such as Gore and Ehrlich literally abominate this man, a Nobelist himself in 1970. If by some totalitarian fit Borlaug had destroyed a billion souls, you can bet that humanity's true enemies would raise Hosannas to their empty skies.

Tulsa Jack said...

Quite so. We note that Gore and his elitist ilk always assume that they themselves will remain unaffected by the policies they advocate for others. It is a measure of their blindness to reality, the real name of which is delusional stupidity, that this possibility doesn't seem to occur to them. They really don't think that words lead to actions that have consequences. This irrational, smug arrogance is what makes them so dangerous.

Pyrthroes said...

Our own irrational, smug arrogance derives from fatalism: If we're all doomed then nothing we say matters, so why not say something smug and arrogant?

BC's introduction to another caveman, Curls [Johnny Hart]: "This is Curls, master of sarcastic wit."

"Say something witty and sarcastic," says BC.

"Pleased to meet you," responds Curls.

So there 'tis-- context is key. Pleased to meet you, Barack-baby.

B. A. Blake said...

What you miss is that resource scarcity is hardly limited to the hard left and has been recognized and profitable for investors of all political persuasions. Particularly the clever ones among the Austrian School. Deeper is more expensive is harder to find.